Sounds Like Ray
Jul. 2nd, 2007 06:40 pm![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
How can you write a convincing narrative voice from RayK's POV, and balance his canonical plain talk with the needs of your story?
NOTE: Most Due South quotes are from Katy’s no-frills link page to various due South Transcripts. (http://www.trinityslash.com/trans/)
Parts of this were adapted from a response to a previous post which is what led me to address this particular topic. I'd say 90% of the 50+ stories I've written are first person RayK, so I thought this was a pretty good fit for me.
********
Flashback - bear with me because it is relevant...
Long time ago when the earth was green, fans started writing their own adventures about their favorite fictional characters. About thirty seconds after that, they started mimeographing them to share with other fans, and then passing out xerox copies at conventions. Once the internet came into being, fan fiction (and porn) drove it through ftp sites, gopher, and then the web. Following along with the writers were critics questioning why they wrote, and how they wrote.
Well, the why was obvious - fans fell in love with the characters and wanted more. More of a character they felt was neglected, more of a story line that ended too soon, more of a relationship that they saw, but one at which the creators only hinted.
I thought the “how” part of the question was also obvious after I read my first fan fiction in the early 1970’s. A fellow Trekkie handed over a story he had written about a young man saving the USS Enterprise from certain destruction. Yes - my first fan fiction was a Mary Sue story that actually featured a fanboy. The story was terrible, of course - none of the characters were true to form. Spock, in particular, sounded like a cross between Robby the Robot and the Oxford English Dictionary.
I knew there was good fiction out there - several Star Trek books devoted chapters to it. They also discussed the bad fiction and what made it that way, and the common theme was bad characterization. Fans knew these shows backwards and forwards. They had the dialog memorized, they knew the combination to Kirk’s safe, that Sulu was right-handed and that Uhura’s first language was Swahili. They knew every catch-phrase, and yet, when it came to write these characters they didn’t get them right. Why?
Because they over-emphasized the traits which made the characters unique. Spock became a super-computer, Kirk became a combination of Admiral Nelson, Patton and Casanova, McCoy whipped up a cure in the 15 minutes it took Scotty to rebuild a warp drive, and Chekov became something out of Gilbert and Sullivan with a Russian accent.
I wondered why this mistake was made over and over again, and the only conclusion I could reach was that stereotyping on steroids was the easiest way to write. It let the reader know that the author knew these characters, too. Mulder broods - have him weeping in the corner. Skinner is in charge - great dom has to be the way then. Jim represses everything - aha! those memories will come out, lead to an emotional breakdown and turn him into a marshmallow. Poor Blair, dragged all over by his flighty mother - had to be abused somewhere along the way, and let us not forget that he’s had more sex than everyone in the station combined (or he’s been obfuscating from day one and is a virgin).
And that finally brings me to Stanley Raymond Kowalski. Dancer. Bit of an astygmatism. Still a trifle obsessed with his ex. Casual dresser. Gets his mouth caught on a word or two. Full of weird euphemisms and pithy phrases. Secretly passionate about his job. Ray Kowalski is pecular, no question about it. From his experimental hair to his bracelet, RayK is as different from Ray Vecchio as night is to day.
A Chicago cop played by a British-born, Canadian-raised actor with a background in radio attempting to duplicate a regional accent consistently (love him to pieces, but...).
So - how does an author capture the essense of Ray? How do you balance his cadence with dialect? Generally speaking, you can’t.
Do not get bogged down in the "des guys over dere" and "dos idiots" etc. Yes, Ray does have a bit of regional uniqueness to his dialog, but it's more Chicago by way of Brooklyn as spoken by a Canadian. I tried to write in it once, but then started micro-managing the dialog until it sounded like a bad Sopranos episode. I finally decided that if the words were chosen correctly, the reader would hear the accent without needing to read it.
Dropping in the occasion 'cuz' or 'ya think' isn't going to pose a problem, but I find reading an entire story with what I've heard one person call "authentic voice" pretty frustrating.
Consider Dr. McCoy’s southern accent. You wouldn’t write every he says in a drawl. You simply use an occasional y’all and remember that the reader is likely hearing his dialog in DeForest Kelly’s voice anyway. If you took the time to spell out every southern word, you are forcing the reader to translate as they read instead of trusting them to hear the voice in their head.
If I write the sentence:
“I’ll get the car...”
I could tell you it was spoken by Ray Kowalski, or Benton Fraser, or Richard Burton (the actor not the explorer), and your brain would supply the correct accent.
So - if not by dialect, how do you capture Ray? Listen to his dialog in any episode.
Ray snaps off short sentences, short phrases:
Yes you are! That's that thing again. You're correcting. You're niggling. You're doing that thing with the T's and the I's, and I say 'A' and you say 'B'. I say 'night' and you say 'day'. (Mounty on the Bounty)
You see? We're like a one-two punch. A duet. You set 'em up, I knock 'em down. You set 'em up, I knock 'em down. (Burning Down The House)
He uses a repetitive style to get his point across:
Look, I don't want to hear it! I don't want to hear it! I don't understand, I don't want to hear it! (Mounty on the Bounty)
I'm off the case? Why, what, why, what, why? (Dead Guy Running)
He's trying to psych me. Franco Devlin is trying to psych me. (Mountie and Soul)
His mouth can’t keep up with his brain and visa versa:
Ray is not stupid. Ray mentions that he went to college and knows enough Milton to try and catch Fraser’s bluff. His malapropisms and spoonerisms do not occur as frequently as we think. You can't rely too much on "butter my muffin" etc. - if you watch the show and actually count the times Ray says it, it's probably under two. Those well-known phrases are quotable and in perfect voice, so everyone uses them, but it's similar with the "Judy, Judy, Judy" line mimics use for Cary Grant. He never said it, but it's so much in his voice, that everyone in the audience recognizes it.
Possible Solutions
Listen to your dialog - read it out loud. I probably write more 'dialog only' stories than most. I generally hear a plot bunny coming long before I see one. The trick that works for me is reading it out loud - it's pretty clear to me when Ray is off key.
Change the POV of the story or the line. For example, write it as Ray, then write it as Fraser. Or say the line as Ray, then see if you could ever hear Welsh saying it. The generic stuff isn't an issue, but if you're trying to develop a "Rayism" and you can hear Huey saying it with no problem, then it probaby doesn't belong to Ray.
An example (forgive me for using my own):
Yeah, well, nice don’t pay the pizza, buddy.
Can you hear anyone else say that line?
It isn't easy developing that ear. You may have strengths in other areas and can tap into the willing and wonderful betas out there. Their constructive criticism can help you "hear" your story.
So one more example, then I’ll let you go...
“Dis is da ting der, Fraser, we gotta take care o’ dis or Welsh’ll kill me, you, and da wolf. We gots ta take care o’ dis right now. Stamp it, file it, stick it in a box marked done.”
or...
“This is the thing, Ok? The thing is, we gotta take care of this or Welsh will fry us in butter and serve us up with tartar sauce.”
Which one would you rather read?
NOTE: Most Due South quotes are from Katy’s no-frills link page to various due South Transcripts. (http://www.trinityslash.com/trans/)
Parts of this were adapted from a response to a previous post which is what led me to address this particular topic. I'd say 90% of the 50+ stories I've written are first person RayK, so I thought this was a pretty good fit for me.
********
Flashback - bear with me because it is relevant...
Long time ago when the earth was green, fans started writing their own adventures about their favorite fictional characters. About thirty seconds after that, they started mimeographing them to share with other fans, and then passing out xerox copies at conventions. Once the internet came into being, fan fiction (and porn) drove it through ftp sites, gopher, and then the web. Following along with the writers were critics questioning why they wrote, and how they wrote.
Well, the why was obvious - fans fell in love with the characters and wanted more. More of a character they felt was neglected, more of a story line that ended too soon, more of a relationship that they saw, but one at which the creators only hinted.
I thought the “how” part of the question was also obvious after I read my first fan fiction in the early 1970’s. A fellow Trekkie handed over a story he had written about a young man saving the USS Enterprise from certain destruction. Yes - my first fan fiction was a Mary Sue story that actually featured a fanboy. The story was terrible, of course - none of the characters were true to form. Spock, in particular, sounded like a cross between Robby the Robot and the Oxford English Dictionary.
I knew there was good fiction out there - several Star Trek books devoted chapters to it. They also discussed the bad fiction and what made it that way, and the common theme was bad characterization. Fans knew these shows backwards and forwards. They had the dialog memorized, they knew the combination to Kirk’s safe, that Sulu was right-handed and that Uhura’s first language was Swahili. They knew every catch-phrase, and yet, when it came to write these characters they didn’t get them right. Why?
Because they over-emphasized the traits which made the characters unique. Spock became a super-computer, Kirk became a combination of Admiral Nelson, Patton and Casanova, McCoy whipped up a cure in the 15 minutes it took Scotty to rebuild a warp drive, and Chekov became something out of Gilbert and Sullivan with a Russian accent.
I wondered why this mistake was made over and over again, and the only conclusion I could reach was that stereotyping on steroids was the easiest way to write. It let the reader know that the author knew these characters, too. Mulder broods - have him weeping in the corner. Skinner is in charge - great dom has to be the way then. Jim represses everything - aha! those memories will come out, lead to an emotional breakdown and turn him into a marshmallow. Poor Blair, dragged all over by his flighty mother - had to be abused somewhere along the way, and let us not forget that he’s had more sex than everyone in the station combined (or he’s been obfuscating from day one and is a virgin).
And that finally brings me to Stanley Raymond Kowalski. Dancer. Bit of an astygmatism. Still a trifle obsessed with his ex. Casual dresser. Gets his mouth caught on a word or two. Full of weird euphemisms and pithy phrases. Secretly passionate about his job. Ray Kowalski is pecular, no question about it. From his experimental hair to his bracelet, RayK is as different from Ray Vecchio as night is to day.
A Chicago cop played by a British-born, Canadian-raised actor with a background in radio attempting to duplicate a regional accent consistently (love him to pieces, but...).
So - how does an author capture the essense of Ray? How do you balance his cadence with dialect? Generally speaking, you can’t.
Do not get bogged down in the "des guys over dere" and "dos idiots" etc. Yes, Ray does have a bit of regional uniqueness to his dialog, but it's more Chicago by way of Brooklyn as spoken by a Canadian. I tried to write in it once, but then started micro-managing the dialog until it sounded like a bad Sopranos episode. I finally decided that if the words were chosen correctly, the reader would hear the accent without needing to read it.
Dropping in the occasion 'cuz' or 'ya think' isn't going to pose a problem, but I find reading an entire story with what I've heard one person call "authentic voice" pretty frustrating.
Consider Dr. McCoy’s southern accent. You wouldn’t write every he says in a drawl. You simply use an occasional y’all and remember that the reader is likely hearing his dialog in DeForest Kelly’s voice anyway. If you took the time to spell out every southern word, you are forcing the reader to translate as they read instead of trusting them to hear the voice in their head.
If I write the sentence:
“I’ll get the car...”
I could tell you it was spoken by Ray Kowalski, or Benton Fraser, or Richard Burton (the actor not the explorer), and your brain would supply the correct accent.
So - if not by dialect, how do you capture Ray? Listen to his dialog in any episode.
Ray snaps off short sentences, short phrases:
Yes you are! That's that thing again. You're correcting. You're niggling. You're doing that thing with the T's and the I's, and I say 'A' and you say 'B'. I say 'night' and you say 'day'. (Mounty on the Bounty)
You see? We're like a one-two punch. A duet. You set 'em up, I knock 'em down. You set 'em up, I knock 'em down. (Burning Down The House)
He uses a repetitive style to get his point across:
Look, I don't want to hear it! I don't want to hear it! I don't understand, I don't want to hear it! (Mounty on the Bounty)
I'm off the case? Why, what, why, what, why? (Dead Guy Running)
He's trying to psych me. Franco Devlin is trying to psych me. (Mountie and Soul)
His mouth can’t keep up with his brain and visa versa:
Ray is not stupid. Ray mentions that he went to college and knows enough Milton to try and catch Fraser’s bluff. His malapropisms and spoonerisms do not occur as frequently as we think. You can't rely too much on "butter my muffin" etc. - if you watch the show and actually count the times Ray says it, it's probably under two. Those well-known phrases are quotable and in perfect voice, so everyone uses them, but it's similar with the "Judy, Judy, Judy" line mimics use for Cary Grant. He never said it, but it's so much in his voice, that everyone in the audience recognizes it.
Possible Solutions
Listen to your dialog - read it out loud. I probably write more 'dialog only' stories than most. I generally hear a plot bunny coming long before I see one. The trick that works for me is reading it out loud - it's pretty clear to me when Ray is off key.
Change the POV of the story or the line. For example, write it as Ray, then write it as Fraser. Or say the line as Ray, then see if you could ever hear Welsh saying it. The generic stuff isn't an issue, but if you're trying to develop a "Rayism" and you can hear Huey saying it with no problem, then it probaby doesn't belong to Ray.
An example (forgive me for using my own):
Yeah, well, nice don’t pay the pizza, buddy.
Can you hear anyone else say that line?
It isn't easy developing that ear. You may have strengths in other areas and can tap into the willing and wonderful betas out there. Their constructive criticism can help you "hear" your story.
So one more example, then I’ll let you go...
“Dis is da ting der, Fraser, we gotta take care o’ dis or Welsh’ll kill me, you, and da wolf. We gots ta take care o’ dis right now. Stamp it, file it, stick it in a box marked done.”
or...
“This is the thing, Ok? The thing is, we gotta take care of this or Welsh will fry us in butter and serve us up with tartar sauce.”
Which one would you rather read?
no subject
Date: 2007-07-03 12:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-03 12:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-03 12:59 am (UTC)Your tip about re-writing in different points of view is a great help; that may well stop me from slipping into Fraser or generic American when I'm trying to write him. Sadly, reading out loud never helps me because I can't get anywhere near his (Chicago cop played by a British-born, Canadian-raised actor) accent, but I suppose I'll just have to listen more carefully for his voice in my head.
There was another question I had about convincing RayK narrative, just in case you had any ideas. One of the things I find most difficult is that I have a completely different frame of reference to Ray. I grew up in a different decade and a different country. So if I want to write about, for instance, Ray at school, I have to look around the internet to work out the kind of clothes he might have worn. Because I wore a black blazer and a black pleat skirt to school. (And now I have this image of CKR in a black pleat skirt, but you take my point.) I was wondering if you ever have this problem with any of the characters? Considering we write about teh gay sex, having never experienced it, you wouldn't think this would be so much of a stumbling block, but for some reason it is.
This is going straight in my bookmarks, so I can come back to it next time I'm tearing my hair out over RayK dialogue. Thank you!
no subject
Date: 2007-07-03 01:27 am (UTC)I'd be tempted to take a look at some typical American coming of age films if you want an idea about wardrobe, dating habits, etc. Believe it or not, Saturday Night Fever is a pretty good prototype. Not that I think Ray would ever be caught dead in that white suit - he's much too cool for that.
Glad you found this helpful. It was a lot of fun!
no subject
Date: 2007-07-03 02:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-03 02:45 am (UTC)The tartar sauce line is part of a work in process. I have no challenge to send it to at the moment, but so it goes.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-03 06:47 am (UTC)What's your stand on the issue of long words? Because Ray has problems saying some words, a lot of people seem to assume that he doesn't know these words, an opinion which I don't share. I think that Ray knows those long words, but - as with everything you don't say often - the syllables get jumbled up on the way from his brain to his mouth, because Ray's already three thoughts ahead and then he's stumbling on the word.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-03 04:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-03 01:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-03 05:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-03 03:11 pm (UTC)Good post, you make some excellent points. (Thanks for pointing out the Milton thing. <3 Ray.)
no subject
Date: 2007-07-03 05:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-06 06:15 pm (UTC)Without trying to come up with some canon reason for the verbal stumbling? I really just think that one or more of the writers thought these little verbal gaffes were the height of humor. It always makes me cringe, and seems mostly like sloppiness in the script. The worst example to me is in Mountie and Soul, when he stumbles over the street name, calling it Vacuum St, rather than Hoover St. Is this supposed to be humor? It's a joke a toddler would make. Am I really to believe that Ray is so flaky? Because I really don't and that line makes me gnash my teeth every time. That ep also has Ray stumbling over the word diuretic and not knowing what it is, which seems unrealistic to me as well. Even Burning Down the House has Ray stumbling over a basic word and concept that most educated people, especially someone in law enforcement, would know--accellerant. So why do the canon writers DO that? I see it as a trend overall in the show that Fraser always has to have the answer, always has to have the key to solving the case, always has to be the one to suggest the next step, know the next piece of knowledge, etc. And that is one strength that fanfic has over canon, IMO. Things come out much more balanced, and they both allowed to be competent, brave, smart, heroic, scared, lonely, etc.
I also hate the word gaffe as a joke, because they stick it on to more than one character...Ray K, Frannie, and Dewey all have to bumble around like idiots over words ("Frost HEAVE" and "culling the herd" for Dewey, and "sliver me timbers" and about a million others for Frannie.) It makes me even pissier when I realize that the other two characters are supposed to be, well, forgive me for saying it, but kind of dumb. I don't think Frannie is dumb, but it is clear that the writers sometimes thought so, and thought it was hilarious. Dewey is a pretty shallow character, and an easy target for dumb as well. So how much does it piss me off to feel like some of the writers, some of the time, thought my beloved Ray was dumb? Well, it pretty much makes steam come out my ears. It makes me have to go read more fanfic and give buckets of feedback and love to those who understand Ray.
As to my own fanon about Ray and the word stumbles. Of course, I have internalized the thing about his brain racing ahead, and that seems fine, but I've always felt like it goes farther, to some self consciousness he has, and to his background. An earlier commenter here mentioned that Ray is a reader. I was delighted to see that, because I have always thought that, too. Ray comes from a background of two working class parents who wanted him to better himself, and that to me is suggestive of someone who would be likely to have a lot of coping strategies to figure out the world, including looking things up and reading outside of school. We know he didn't have a lot of academic success in regular school, but I can see him trying to figure out things by imitation, by reading, etc. If he picked up a word he hadn't heard before in conversation with someone, he may have had trouble memorizing it. If he picked up a new word through reading it in a magazine or book, he might not know how to pronounce it, having never heard it spoken aloud.
Do we have direct canon that Ray attended college, or is that pure fanon? I do believe that Ray went to college, and I happen to think he probably graduated, which doesn't seem to be the consensus. I guess I feel this way, because it would be so difficult to rise to detective without a college degree in this day.
Terrific essay. You picked great examples and covered so much.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-06 09:59 pm (UTC)Ray: You know Fraser, uh...when I was in college, um, I used to go to the track and play the horses. Uh...One day I was down there and I met this chick form, ah...Albany. She had a good line and I bought it - hook, line, sinker, you know. Before she left, she'd taken everything.
I know some people interpret Ray's stammering about as a bluff - that he never went to school. Me, I'm taking it at face value, particularly since the Chicago PD requires 60 hours of college for entrance as per their web page.
I look at Ray's word stumbles one of two ways, depending on my mood. He's dyslexic, which puts him in some damn good company (http://www.dyslexia.com/qafame.htm) including me :->
or
He's suffering from Anomic Aphasia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anomic_aphasia) as a result of head injury, repeated concussions, etc.
Neither of these preclude intelligence, and would explain his inability to grab a word. If he's been stumbling about since childhood, it's dyslexia - children's brains have a tendency to recover from the type of injury that causes Aphasia, while adult brains are not so flexible (so lovely to know neurologists...). The reason can become part of the story, but I can't help but think he's ready to deck people over all the correcting that goes on.
Both Pauls are fond of the pun. Frannie's character is more consistently liable to grab the wrong word or phrase than anyone else. I think she needs to have her ears checked, to be honest.
Thanks so much for the comment. Giving a voice to Ray is one of my favorite things.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-08 02:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-08 01:03 pm (UTC)My father had several strokes a couple years ago, and his abilty to grab the right word has suffered. Seeing how frustrated he gets when people try to finish his sentences, I can better understand how Ray feels when he can't find the word and knows - just knows - that someone thinks it is helpful to find it for him.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-08 08:55 pm (UTC)So yes, it is canon that Ray went to college. But he did not finish.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-09 01:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-08 10:12 pm (UTC)These people are detectives. What did they do for brains before Fraser got there? If Ray (either Ray) is as dependent on Fraser to help him figure things out as he is usually portrayed in the episodes, I can't help wondering if Beth Botrell is the only person who shouldn't be in jail. It's kind of scary.
Fortunately, most writers in this fandom seem to have a sense of this as well, and tend to make up for it in their fanfic, evening out the distribution of intelligence more equitably between Ray and Fraser. It's something of a relief.
I doubt I'm the only fan who, during the "Say Amen" episode thought, Wouldn't it make sense at this point for Ray The Detective to wonder aloud, "So the witnesses say the dead guy and the kid came into the room fighting, but the dead guy's lying out in the hallway. And who gets stabbed in the back during a knife fight, hm? Something's not right about this, Fraser."
Some day someone in fandom will fix that for me, I just know it. :)
Anyway, regarding RayK's accent/dialect, yes, I know exactly what you mean. I read/write in another fandom, often RPS, and the characters involved often have one accent or another. Trying to imitate in print the precise *sound* of an Australian, Cockney or a Yorkshire accent instead turns out terribly distracting for me as a reader. My "reading ear" so often comes to a screeching halt to wonder "What??" that I can't hear the character's voice at all.
On the other hand, I find that simply writing in the dialect's *style* reads rather better. There's no need to get carried away. All we're really after is to distinguish one character's voice from another within the story, and then our own memory of what that character sounds like takes care of the rest.
I haven't written anything for this fandom yet. I'd like to (couple of plot-bunnies snuffling around behind my sofa), but I'm still the nervous newbie, when it comes to making the leap from reading to writing as well. This is a very helpful post, as I have been wondering a bit as to how I might best handle our twitchy but charming RayK, were I to get up the nerve and make the jump. Thanks!
no subject
Date: 2007-07-09 01:27 pm (UTC)Oh, gods, Australian! The only character more abused than Ray is probably Megan over in Sentinelville. She sounds like Paul Hogan on speed in many stories. Everything in moderation would make the reader's life so much easier...
This is a great place to dip that nervous toe in ever so slightly. dS-land is just wonderful for new writers, and we're always happy to offer any support yu might need.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-09 04:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-09 01:44 pm (UTC)I relied so much on those transcripts when I started writing dS since I hadn't actually seen more than a couple episodes with RayK in them. Without them, I would have thought greatness, buddies, kick 'em in the head, etc were catch phrases showing up in every episode.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-19 09:56 pm (UTC)I wrote something crazy long in a Rayvoice and one of the things I learnt early on was to be sparing and concentrate more on idiom then stock phrases. I'm insanely pleased with somebody in comments using "film at 11" because I semi-independently came up with a similar image (bad reality cop show) to describe life without Fraser.